{"id":7789,"date":"2024-06-18T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-06-18T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ai-governance\/tajikistan-in-the-girai-2023-assessment-a-strategy-without-a-framework\/"},"modified":"2026-05-04T13:22:15","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T07:22:15","slug":"tajikistan-in-the-girai-2023-assessment-a-strategy-without-a-framework","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/tajikistan-in-the-girai-2023-assessment-a-strategy-without-a-framework\/","title":{"rendered":"Tajikistan in the GIRAI 2023 Assessment: A Strategy Without a Framework"},"content":{"rendered":"<!-- KGLABS-QUESTIONS\nPost 1.3 \u2014 Tajikistan GIRAI 2023 profile, observational read\nAuthor review requested before production publish.\n\n1. Publication consent and authorship consent fields are blank in the source templates \u2014 was consent obtained from the Tajikistan GIRAI researcher? Please confirm before publish.\n2. The surveillance \/ Safe City \/ facial recognition section is based on the researcher's reported conversations, not confirmed evidence. Comfortable including it with the caveat language used here, or prefer to remove it entirely?\n3. The GIRAI global ranking for Tajikistan is not available in the extracted source files. If you have the score or ranking, please share so the post can include it (as done for Kazakhstan's 74th place).\n4. CABAR.asia (Rustam Gulov) is cited as the main non-state media voice on AI. Are there other civil society or media actors you want added?\n\nASSUMPTIONS-USED-IF-UNANSWERED:\n1. Post proceeds with observational framing pending confirmation of researcher consent; flagged for author review before publish.\n2. Surveillance section included with explicit \"cannot be confirmed\" framing drawn directly from researcher's own account.\n3. Global ranking omitted; readers directed to global-index.ai for full scores.\n4. Rustam Gulov \/ CABAR.asia cited as only confirmed non-state media actor.\n-->\n\n<!--\nTAXONOMY PACK\n=============\nSource folder: 2023-09 GIRAI\/Country level context and insights...\/Tajikistan\/\nSources used: Tajikistan_country_context.md, Tajikistan_research_findings_summary.md\nSecondary sources: Digital Watch Observatory, Oxford Insights Tajikistan spotlight, ASIA-Plus\nOutput file: post-girai-tajikistan-2023.html\nLocalhost push: ID 10091 \u2014 UPDATE in place\n\nPrimary category: AI Governance\nSecondary category: Policy &amp; Advocacy\nContent type: post\nGeography: Tajikistan, Dushanbe; Central Asia comparison\nTimeframe: 2023 (GIRAI 1st Edition), retrospective read April 2026\n\nTags: GIRAI | Tajikistan | responsible AI | AI policy | Central Asia comparison | AI governance | National AI strategy\nMeta keywords: GIRAI Tajikistan, Tajikistan AI policy, Tajikistan AI strategy 2022-2040, responsible AI Central Asia, AI governance Dushanbe\nMeta description: Tajikistan was the first country in Central Asia \u2014 and the first low-income country globally \u2014 to adopt a National AI Strategy. The GIRAI 2023 assessment found the accountability layer missing.\nAI-agent annotation: Observational read of the Tajikistan GIRAI 2023 country profile. Tajikistan adopted its AI Strategy (2022\u20132040) in September 2022, targeting 5% of GDP from AI by 2040, but scores thin on responsible governance, human rights protections, and accountability frameworks. Source: markitdown-output\/2023-09 GIRAI\/.\n\nMEDIA ANNOTATIONS\n=================\n[FEATURED IMAGE] \u2014 needs-review (media-only PENDING)\nSuggested: Dushanbe cityscape or university\/technology setting. Location named.\n\nCONFIRMED FROM SOURCES\n======================\n- National AI Strategy 2022-2040 (government portal, currently inaccessible):\n  http:\/\/www.portali-huquqi.tj\/publicadliya\/view_qonunhoview.php?showdetail=&amp;asosi_id=26592\n- Stable secondary citation: https:\/\/dig.watch\/resource\/strategy-for-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-republic-of-tajikistan-for-the-period-up-to-2040\n- Oxford Insights Tajikistan spotlight: https:\/\/oxfordinsights.com\/insights\/spotlight-series-tajikistan\/\n- GDP target: 5% by 2040, 1% by 2026 (confirmed across ASIA-Plus, Oxford Insights, Digital Watch)\n- 7 HEIs with AI departments by 2026; 5,000 AI specialists by 2040 (Digital Watch)\n- zypl.ai banking: AI underwrites 25% of all loans across 8 financial institutions (Oxford Insights)\n- Azizjon Azimi quote \"avoid the middle income trap\": Oxford Insights\n- CABAR.asia AI and media article (author: Rustam Gulov): https:\/\/cabar.asia\/en\/how-artificial-intelligence-will-change-media-in-tajikistan-2\n- Green City Project (Dushanbe): https:\/\/ebrdgreencities.com\/assets\/Uploads\/PDF\/Dushanbe_GCAP_2022_RUS.pdf?vid=3\n- MSU event Nov 25 2021 \u2014 \"Creating Opportunities with AI\", speaker Azizjon Azimi: https:\/\/msu.tj\/ru\/news?id=232\n- University AI courses (TUT.tj): https:\/\/tut.tj\/?page_id=1742&amp;lang=ru\n- UNICEF \/ Ministry of Labour \"Professional Guide and Youth Portal\": https:\/\/mehnat.tj\/en\/cooperation\/currentprojects\n- Surveillance\/Safe City\/facial recognition: researcher conversations only \u2014 NOT confirmed\n- Governance gaps confirmed: human oversight, safety, accountability, proportionality, transparent procurement, access to remedy\n- MPs lack AI regulatory knowledge: stated by AI Council members in interview (researcher account)\n- GIRAI global ranking: not available in source files \u2014 direct to https:\/\/www.global-index.ai\/\n-->\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Tajikistan in the GIRAI 2023 Assessment: A Strategy Without a Framework<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p>In September 2022, Tajikistan adopted the <a href=\"https:\/\/dig.watch\/resource\/strategy-for-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-republic-of-tajikistan-for-the-period-up-to-2040\"><strong>Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence for the Period up to 2040<\/strong><\/a> \u2014 becoming the first country in Central Asia and the first low-income country in the world to put a dedicated national AI strategy in place. When the <strong>Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI) 1st Edition<\/strong> assessed Tajikistan the following year, that document was the most significant thing the governance landscape had to show. The full GIRAI scores for Tajikistan are available at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.global-index.ai\/\">global-index.ai<\/a>. What the assessment found, alongside the strategy, was an almost complete absence of the responsible AI infrastructure that would give it ethical content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Three-Dimensional Breakdown<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>GIRAI structures every country profile across three top-level dimensions evaluated through thematic areas and actor categories. Legend: <strong>\u2713<\/strong> = documented evidence approved by GIRAI headquarters \u00b7 <strong>\u25d0<\/strong> = drafted, planned, or partially documented \u00b7 <strong>\u2014<\/strong> = no documented evidence at the time of assessment. Full per-indicator scores at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.global-index.ai\/\">global-index.ai<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Dimension 1 \u2014 Responsible AI Governance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-stripes\"><table><thead><tr><th>Thematic area<\/th><th>Status<\/th><th>Evidence (Tajikistan)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Enabling policies<\/td><td>\u2713<\/td><td>National AI Strategy 2022\u20132040 adopted September 2022 \u2014 first in Central Asia, first in any low-income country globally. Headline target: 5% of GDP from AI by 2040, 1% by 2026.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Rule of law<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>No accountability or human-oversight provisions in the strategy. AI Council members have stated parliament lacks the knowledge to formulate AI standards.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Technical standards<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>No national AI technical standards in force.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Technology-specific regulation<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>No regulation of AI in finance (despite zypl.ai underwriting 25% of loans across 8 banks), surveillance, healthcare, or other deployed domains.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Responsible AI Governance dimension \u2014 Tajikistan, GIRAI 1st Edition (2023).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Dimension 2 \u2014 Human Rights and AI<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-stripes\"><table><thead><tr><th>Thematic area<\/th><th>Framework<\/th><th>Gov. action<\/th><th>Private sector<\/th><th>Civil society<\/th><th>Academia<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Freedom of Expression<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Public Participation<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Data Protection<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Cultural &amp; Linguistic Diversity<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Health &amp; Well-Being<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Children&#8217;s Rights<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Indigenous Data Sovereignty<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bias &amp; Unfair Discrimination<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Gender Equality<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Education<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u25d0<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u25d0<\/td><td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Environmental Protection<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u25d0<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Labour Protection<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Human Rights and AI dimension \u2014 Tajikistan, GIRAI 1st Edition (2023). \u25d0 for Education reflects AI Council masterclasses (incl. Nov 2021 MSU Tajikistan event) and university AI courses without ethics components. \u25d0 for Environmental Protection reflects EBRD Green City Action Plan Dushanbe (2022) AI-adjacent smart city measures.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Dimension 3 \u2014 National Responsible AI Capacities<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-stripes\"><table><thead><tr><th>Sub-dimension<\/th><th>Status<\/th><th>Evidence (Tajikistan)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Institutions<\/td><td>\u25d0<\/td><td>AI Council under Ministry of Innovative Development, chaired by Azizjon Azimi. Strategy targets 7 higher-education institutions with AI departments by 2026 and 5,000 AI specialists by 2040 (technical, not governance-oriented). zypl.ai is the dominant private-sector institution \u2014 and also the country&#8217;s most commercially consequential AI deployment.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Investments<\/td><td>\u2713<\/td><td>Multi-source: state budget, development partners, private sector. zypl.ai is self-sustaining via revenue from financial-services AI \u2014 unusual in the region for not depending on state subsidy. Pathway to the 5%\/1% GDP targets not yet specified.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Competencies<\/td><td>\u2014<\/td><td>AI Council has stated parliament lacks the knowledge to formulate AI standards. Governance capacity to oversee deployments is acknowledged as absent. Conflict between development promotion and accountability oversight unresolved (the same Council promotes AI and is led by the country&#8217;s primary commercial AI actor).<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">National Responsible AI Capacities dimension \u2014 Tajikistan, GIRAI 1st Edition (2023).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Strategy: Ambition at Scale<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The 2022\u20132040 strategy sets a headline target: AI-related activity to reach <strong>5% of GDP by 2040<\/strong>, with an intermediate milestone of 1% by 2026. The rationale, articulated by <strong>Azizjon Azimi<\/strong> \u2014 Chairman of Tajikistan&#8217;s AI Council and founder of Central Asia&#8217;s first AI laboratory \u2014 is that AI offers a route to avoid the middle income trap by leapfrogging traditional industrialization stages. Four pillars structure the strategy:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Smart Regionalization<\/strong> \u2014 Safe City surveillance systems, smart meters, and billing infrastructure across Dushanbe and regional cities<\/li>\n<li><strong>Education and Human Capital<\/strong> \u2014 AI departments in 7 higher education institutions by 2026; 5,000 qualified AI specialists trained by 2040<\/li>\n<li><strong>E-Government<\/strong> \u2014 unified state database, a national Open Data portal, AI-integrated public services<\/li>\n<li><strong>Industrial Acceleration<\/strong> \u2014 AI applied to manufacturing quality control, labor productivity, and carbon reduction<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Implementation is staged: phases one and two (2023\u20132025) cover legal and institutional foundations; later phases move toward full sector integration and, ultimately, technology export. The financing model is multi-source \u2014 state budget, development partners, private sector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some of this is already running. By the time the GIRAI assessment was conducted, zypl.ai \u2014 the AI company Azimi founded \u2014 was providing AI underwriting for <strong>one quarter of all loans<\/strong> across eight financial institutions in Tajikistan. Telecom providers had built in-house churn-prediction models. Career counseling algorithms were being piloted in schools. The technology deployment is real and moving. What it is not accompanied by is governance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Responsible AI Governance: A Development Agenda, Not an Accountability One<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The GIRAI assessment identifies the same gap that <a href=\"https:\/\/oxfordinsights.com\/insights\/spotlight-series-tajikistan\/\">Oxford Insights<\/a> documented in its own Tajikistan spotlight: sector regulators lack AI training, no formal AI-specific regulations exist beyond the strategy document, standardized guidance across agencies is absent, and responsible AI approval standards remain unwritten. The strategy commits to a legal and institutional framework \u2014 but stages it for later phases, after the technology is already deployed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The GIRAI researcher&#8217;s assessment is direct: human oversight of AI operations, safety standards, accountability mechanisms, proportionality requirements, transparent procurement, and access to remedy do not appear in the strategy or in related government initiatives. The AI governance framework that exists is a development framework. The political environment reinforces this. Policymaking operates without public scrutiny; the government treats AI as a domain of progress, and critical examination of AI risks is regarded as an impediment rather than a component. The result is a governance conversation that, in the researcher&#8217;s words, is &#171;building more walls around AI implementation, protecting it from critical views.&#187;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Human Rights and AI: Education and Environment, Little Else<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>No national framework or legislation addresses the potential risks of AI for human security, privacy, or civil liberties. Public discourse on the human rights dimension of AI is thin across both state and non-state actors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The clearest exception is <strong>Rustam Gulov<\/strong>, a new media expert writing for <a href=\"https:\/\/cabar.asia\/en\/how-artificial-intelligence-will-change-media-in-tajikistan-2\"><strong>CABAR.asia<\/strong><\/a>, who tested AI tools for journalistic use and identified structural barriers to adoption in Tajikistan&#8217;s media environment: limited internet access, insufficient professional skills, and press freedom constraints. The piece is a practical adoption assessment rather than a rights critique, but it represents one of the few critical engagements with AI&#8217;s societal effects published in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Two thematic areas showed positive evidence in the GIRAI assessment. <strong>Education<\/strong>: the AI Council ran awareness events at universities \u2014 including a November 2021 masterclass titled <em>&#171;Creating Opportunities with Artificial Intelligence&#187;<\/em> at <a href=\"https:\/\/msu.tj\/ru\/news?id=232\">MSU Tajikistan<\/a> delivered by Azimi himself, feeding students into zypl.ai&#8217;s educational pipeline \u2014 and <a href=\"https:\/\/tut.tj\/?page_id=1742&amp;lang=ru\">several universities have introduced AI courses<\/a> into their programs. <strong>Environmental protection<\/strong>: the strategy names green economy as a development goal, and AI is included among the tools referenced in the <a href=\"https:\/\/ebrdgreencities.com\/assets\/Uploads\/PDF\/Dushanbe_GCAP_2022_RUS.pdf?vid=3\">EBRD Green City Action Plan for Dushanbe<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Beyond those two areas, the GIRAI researcher found the human rights dimension largely absent \u2014 not suppressed in any specific instance, but simply not present as a subject of policy, advocacy, or academic inquiry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Surveillance: Reported but Unconfirmed<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The country context report includes a finding that sits at the edge of what the GIRAI framework can document. The researcher received accounts \u2014 in direct conversations \u2014 that Tajikistan&#8217;s security services may be using AI for surveillance and social crediting. This cannot be confirmed from open sources without substantial risk to sources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is documented: reports from two years before the assessment described Tajikistan&#8217;s intent to integrate Chinese facial recognition technologies into the existing &#171;Safe City&#187; network in Dushanbe \u2014 a city-wide street camera system already operational at the time. The rollout coincided with a government decree requiring citizens to replace paper passports with biometric IDs, with mobile network access threatened for those who refused. The researcher&#8217;s reading is that this was likely intended to build the digital data infrastructure required for AI tracking systems. As of the GIRAI research period, no confirmed open evidence of an operational facial recognition system existed. The strategy&#8217;s first pillar \u2014 Smart Regionalization \u2014 explicitly includes expansion of surveillance systems, which sits alongside these concerns without resolving them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">National AI Capacities: Skills Without Governance Depth<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Tajikistan&#8217;s capacity-building is concentrated on entry-level skills and popularization: university courses, student awareness events, extracurricular programs. The <a href=\"https:\/\/mehnat.tj\/en\/cooperation\/currentprojects\">UNICEF Tajikistan and Ministry of Labour &#171;Professional Guide and Youth Portal&#187;<\/a> initiative fits this pattern. The AI Council has acknowledged that ethics is part of the eventual agenda \u2014 but that acknowledgment has not produced any concrete instrument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The AI Council itself has noted, in conversations with the GIRAI researcher, that members of parliament lack the knowledge required to formulate AI standards or regulatory policy. The gap is not just between strategy documents and practice; it runs through the institutions responsible for closing it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What the Profile Shows<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Tajikistan in 2023 held an unusual position: first in the region with a national AI strategy, and first low-income country globally to adopt one \u2014 while also being the country where the gap between that strategy and a responsible AI framework was widest. The technology is deploying, the GDP targets are set, and the governance infrastructure is staged for later. The GIRAI baseline captures that sequence. Whether the accountability layer arrives before or after the systems it is meant to govern is what subsequent assessments will be able to measure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-text-color has-kg-neutral-100-color has-alpha-channel-opacity has-kg-neutral-100-background-color is-style-wide\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-kg-neutral-400-color has-text-color\" style=\"font-size:0.875rem\">Based on the Tajikistan country context and research findings submitted to the Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI) 1st Edition, 2023. Data source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.global-index.ai\/\">global-index.ai<\/a>. Strategy reference: <a href=\"https:\/\/dig.watch\/resource\/strategy-for-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-republic-of-tajikistan-for-the-period-up-to-2040\">Digital Watch Observatory<\/a>. Regional hub: IDFI (Georgia). This is an observational read by KG Labs as part of its Central Asia AI governance coverage. Publication consent: pending author confirmation.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tajikistan in the GIRAI 2023 Assessment: A Strategy Without a Framework In September 2022, Tajikistan adopted the Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence for the Period up to 2040 \u2014 becoming the first country in Central Asia and the first low-income country in the world to put a dedicated national AI strategy in place. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[246,375],"tags":[495,487,507,444,382,508,484,644,505,637,673,485,504,506],"class_list":["post-7789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai-governance","category-policy-and-regulation","tag-ai-governance","tag-ai-policy","tag-azizjon-azimi","tag-central-asia","tag-dushanbe","tag-ebrd-green-city","tag-girai","tag-series-girai-2023","tag-national-ai-strategy","tag-format-research","tag-op-research-evidence","tag-responsible-ai","tag-tajikistan","tag-zypl-ai"],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"3.0.2","language":"ru","enabled_languages":["en","ru"],"languages":{"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"ru":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7789"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7789\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7838,"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7789\/revisions\/7838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kglabs.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}